Home | Français | About the Course | Before you Begin | Begin the Course | About OHPRS | Feedback | Contact us
Module 4: Theories >> Content Discussion
Section A
Foundations of Health Promotion

  Module 1
  Definitions and Concepts

--Module 2
--Milestones
--Module 3
--Models of Health
--& Health Promotion
--Module 4
--Theories
   ---Learning Outcomes
   ---Reflective Exercise
   ---Content Discussion
   ---Reflective Exercise
   ---Content Discussion
   ---Reflective Exercise
   ---Readings and Resources

-----
Section B
Health Promotion in Action
--Module 5
--Strategies
--Module 6
--Features
--Module 7
--Values
Section C
Building your Health Promotion Practice
--Module 8
--Current Practice
--Module 9
--Future Considerations
-----

Content Discussion

Community Mobilization: Rothman’s Framework

As was noted in Module 1, the active involvement of community members in identifying their health priorities and developing appropriate actions to deal with these priorities is a key feature of health promotion practice. A number of theoretical frameworks have been developed to describe this process.

Perhaps the most influential framework illustrating the various approaches to community mobilization is Rothman’s Framework, which describes three distinct approaches to involving communities in health promotion work (Rothman and Tropman, 1987). The three approaches are:

social planning
locality development
social action

Social planning is a task-oriented method stressing rational problem solving, usually by an outside party, to address community concerns. Outside change agents gather facts about community problems and recommend the most appropriate responses.

Locality development is a more process oriented approach that attempts to build a sense of group identity and community. Community workers organize a broad cross-section of people into small, task-oriented groups to identify and resolve shared problems.

Social action, a more confrontational approach, seeks to address imbalances of power between marginalized community groups and dominant segments of the community.

Table 4.2 provides a clearer distinction between these approaches according to key variables.

<Previous>


   
Case Studies
Checklists
Readings/ Resources
Reflective Exercises
Glossary
By Module
Full Course
Home | Français | About the Course | Before you Begin | Begin the Course | About OHPRS | Feedback | Contact us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.